ChemoBuddy

Developed in collaboration with Mayo Clinic Oncology, a companion app for cancer patients, designed for their lowest-energy moments.

Mayo Clinic Observership Awardee

Category

Healthcare

Client

Mayo Clinic

Duration

10 Weeks

Tool

Figma

Background

Meet ChemoBuddy

ChemoBuddy is a patient-centered digital companion for people undergoing chemotherapy, developed as a Mayo Clinic Observership project in collaboration with Mayo Clinic Oncology. The concept started from a simple observation: chemotherapy patients are handed hundreds of pages of generic information at exactly the moment they have the least energy, focus, and emotional bandwidth to use it. ChemoBuddy closes that gap by reducing cognitive load, offering just-in-time guidance, and helping patients manage symptoms and treatment between clinical visits.

Outcomes

What Changed

95%

of participants completed the core tasks in the prototype without assistance

40%

reported feeling less anxious navigating the experience than with traditional information sources

30%

increase in accuracy when logging and describing symptoms using the visual tracker

85%

longer engagement during testing sessions, average interaction time rose from 4.2 to 7.8 minutes

Problem

The Weight of a Bad Day

Chemotherapy patients navigate far more than medical treatment; the emotional and cognitive weight of the disease compounds over time. Five problems kept surfacing:

01
Information overload
Patients are given hundreds of pages of generic material that is difficult to navigate when cognitive capacity is low.
02
24/7 anxiety
03
Symptom confusion
04
Logistical complexity
05
Caregiver visibility gaps

Design challenge

How might I design an experience that helps chemotherapy patients understand and manage their treatment when their energy, focus, and emotional capacity are at their lowest?

My role

Where I Came In

I led end-to-end research and design for ChemoBuddy, from literature review, competitive analysis, and role-play research to persona development, ideation, and low- and high-fidelity design. My oncology mentor, Dr. Umar, served as my clinical sounding board throughout: he helped simulate patient and caregiver scenarios without direct patient access and reviewed the accuracy of the symptom guidance in the final product.

My contribution

What I owned

Working within a 7-person team, these were the three pieces I owned end to end from concept through clinical validation.

Multimodal education content

Designing the education library so patients could learn the same information through video, text, or audio, depending on what they had the energy for.

Symptom tracking

Designing the logging flow and severity indicators that helped patients tell the difference between "watch this" and "call someone."

Chatbot experience

Scoping and designing the conversational flow as an educational, supportive layer only, working with Dr. Umar's clinical review to keep every response appropriate.

Research

Research Without a Waiting Room

A 10-week effort to understand how chemotherapy patients absorb information, manage fear, and lean on the people around them.

I worked through three tracks in parallel: a literature review, a competitive teardown of existing tools, and structured role-play with my oncology mentor to simulate what patients and caregivers actually go through. What started as a goal to simplify patient education became something bigger: understanding how people process information and depend on others when they're at their lowest.

Literature Review

Week 1–2

Competitive Analysis

Week 3

Role-Play Research

Week 4-5

Data Synthesis

Week 6-7

Literature review

Before sketching a single screen, I wanted to know what the research already said about how chemotherapy patients process information and engage with digital health tools.

What are mHealth cancer apps doing well, and where are they falling short for patients managing treatment day to day?

How does symptom tracking affect patient-reported outcomes during chemotherapy?

Does digital patient education actually improve treatment adherence, or just information recall?

Where can a chatbot contribute safely and usefully in an oncology context, and where should it stop?

Reviewed 11 peer-reviewed oncology studies and digital health journals focusing on: mHealth cancer apps, symptom management & patient-reported outcomes (PROs), digital education tools and treatment adherence, and early experiments with chatbots in oncology.

Key findings

INSIGHT 1

Health literacy alone doesn't guarantee patients follow a plan when information is complex or emotionally charged.

INSIGHT 2

Multimodal education, audio, video, and simplified text, leads to significantly higher engagement than text-only formats.

INSIGHT 3

Chatbots work best as educational and supportive tools, not diagnostic engines.

Key research insights

What the Research Was Really Saying

How information is delivered matters as much as what it says

of participants completed the core tasks in the prototype without assistance


Existing tools are fragmented and reactive

reported feeling less anxious navigating the experience than with traditional information sources

Patients want a clear next step, and fatigue sets in fast

increase in accuracy when logging and describing symptoms using the visual tracker

Chatbots work best as educational and supportive tools

longer engagement during testing sessions, average interaction time rose from 4.2 to 7.8 minutes

From insight to feature

How I turned insight into decisions

Four "how might I" questions guided every feature decision. Here's how each one turned into something real.

  1. How might I simplify complex chemotherapy information without oversimplifying it?

  2. How might I help patients quickly interpret symptoms and recognize when action is required?

  3. How might I reduce the effort needed to manage daily treatment logistics?

  4. How might I support caregivers without increasing patient burden?

Mapping the flow

Low-fidelity wireframes

I built low-fidelity wireframes to test layout, navigation, and information hierarchy specifically against the cognitive and emotional state of a chemotherapy patient, not just to sketch the interface. This is where the conversational-onboarding decision took shape, and where I mapped the core flows: onboarding, dashboard, chatbot, symptom tracking, and patient profile, before investing in visual design.

What Shipped

High-fidelity design, with goals

The final visual system carried through the same principles: calm, predictable, accessible, easy to scan.

Onboarding - A Calm Start

Dashboard - Personalized Treatment Overview

Chatbot - Context-Aware Support

Symptom Tracking - Making Self-Monitoring Easier

Patient Profile - Centralizing Essential Info

Future scope

Role-based caregiver access - Structured permission levels so caregivers get exactly the visibility they need, without exposing the patient's full record.

Real-time data sync - Direct connection to hospital systems so treatment updates, appointments, and reports stay current without manual entry.

Cross-device support - Extending the same experience beyond mobile, so patients can access it wherever's most convenient for them.

Read more.

Let's build something people love using.

©Gauri Rasote 2026. All rights reserved.

Designed with love, one pixel at a time ;)

Let's build something people love using.

©Gauri Rasote 2026. All rights reserved.

Designed with love, one pixel at a time ;)

Let's build something people love using.

©Gauri Rasote 2026. All rights reserved.

Designed with love, one pixel at a time ;)

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.